Is Cloud Computing just a fancy name for Virtualization?
Two of the hottest terms in computing these days are virtualization and cloud computing. Are these two terms the same? Are they mutually exclusive? Does one depend on the other? This article will demystify the terms and help the reader understand how each technology fits today’s organizations.
What is Cloud Computing?
The term “Cloud Computing” comes from the symbol usually used to depict the Internet on network diagrams. That term would lead one to believe that some portion of their computing environment “lives” on the Internet (and that assumption would be true). This type of computing environment is quite a departure from most computing environments today where all computing resources are owned and/or operated within an organization’s LAN/WAN infrastructure.
So, Cloud Computing is some type of service. Cloud Computing can be a service for a single piece of software (like Google Docs), a single component for software (like Microsoft SQL Data Services), Virtual Servers (like Amazon EC2), etc. The main advantage to Cloud Computing is the service provider takes care of all the capital expenditure (CapEx) and a percentage of the operational expenditure (OpEx) depending on the type of service. For example, Google Docs takes care of 100% CapEx and 100% OpEx, whereas Amazon EC2 takes care of 100% CapEx but maybe 25% OpEx.
What is Virtualization?
Virtualization is another hot topic today. A lot of people think virtualization means server virtualization, but the truth is virtualization is a very broad topic. There are many types of virtualization including server virtualization, application virtualization, desktop virtualization, operating system virtualization, presentation virtualization, etc. (I will cover the various types of virtualization in a future article). But, for the purposes of this article, we will focus on server virtualization.
A virtual server is basically the same as a physical server based on outward appearances. Virtual servers perform the same functions as physical servers. In fact, it is nearly impossible to distinguish a physical server from a virtual server when logged on to the server console (unless you start to go look at drivers). The key difference between physical servers and virtual servers is that virtual servers are not installed on the physical hardware (they are hardware agnostic). Virtual servers are installed on something called a hypervisor. This hypervisor allows you to run many virtual servers on a single piece of physical hardware (there are a lot of other benefits to server virtualization, but for the purposes of this article we will focus on hardware independence and consolidation).
So, Cloud Computing doesn’t need Virtualization then – right?
Well, technically, Cloud Computing doesn’t require virtualization. But, in order for Cloud Computing to be a practical service offering, you need the economies of scale and automation capabilities of virtualization. Otherwise, the cloud service provider would need to manually provision services per client with dedicated hardware.
Nicholas Carr draws a nice analogy in his book titled Does IT Matter? Up until the last decade of the nineteenth century, most manufacturers relied on water or steam power to operate their machinery. These power systems were large, complex, and expensive. Around the turn of the century, construction of central power stations in cities brought the operating benefits of electric power to small manufacturers. These small manufacturers couldn’t afford to build their own infrastructure, but they could afford to purchase power in small quantities from a utility. Eventually, all manufacturers converted to using power from utility companies. Electric power is now a commodity instead of a competitive advantage.
Look for these topics in future articles:
- Types of Cloud Services (*aaS)
- Types of Virtualization
- Offline Computing in an Online World
- Virtualization and Service Oriented Architecture
Great explanation. Good detail
nice article. Although i believe this is the future, it creates lots of different views.. i believe in 10 years time 50% of the ICT guys will use Cloud Computing. Even though the there is lots of potential, there are a lot of issues on this day. Security or acceptance or a accepting this new technology being one of them. Would the big company’s like microsoft, ibm, governments use this? I believe so, but only in their own datacenters.. does that qualifiy as cloud computing? And is SaaS the same as cloud computing? And what category does Azure fall in. The term Cloud Computing is too general a name, and so the name does not really stand for anything. It’s like the general name “Internet”.
It’s funny that you would name the book “Does IT matter”, because a few big companies, especially the hospitals are reverting to creating their own power, based on Gas. Gas (in the netherlands) is apparently more stable than the elektrical power output..
the other thing is that in the netherlands, the power DISTRIBUTION is the problem.. charging cars on elektrical power is not possible because the infrastructure couldn’t handle it (at this time).
mayby a bit far from the subject, but i wanted to show that analogies only go that far..